The One Word Project Book

September 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Blog powered by TypePad

Site Meter


« British Museum | Main | Marsha Stein: Pride »

Tuesday, January 11, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c3d4753ef00d8346e1ad869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Monika Sosnowska @ Serpentine Gallery:

Comments

Hi JT.,

Regarding:

"To start, the installation felt like a funhouse maze. I not once questioned architecture. I not once felt "confounded" or as if my perceptions had been altered."

and

"Has anyone seen this exhibition? Were you confounded? Or did you basically just walk straight through the piece and say, "What's next?"

I can tell you didn't like the show but I am also curious what you mean by (in what sense you are using the word) "confounded". Also why do you think you should have questioned architecture as a function of your experience of the work?

I wonder sometimes if we don't take press releses too seriously. Did you take the press release at it's word? Do you think Serpentine defines the term confounded the same way you do?

What I'm getting at, in a round about way is I wonder how/if your perception of this show would be have been different without it's PR on your mind? Ok that's all.
cheers
J

Good question J. For the vast majority of us viewers, press releases are all we've got to get to the heart of an exhibition. They give us a sense for what the artist's intentions are. Did I take the press release at its word? You bet. Why wouldn't I? If I am to measure the success of the piece by the ability for the maze to confound and alter the space, it fails miserably. That's the guidelines that the Serpentine sets forth. Could it succeed in other respects not stated in the release? Certainly. But for me it failed all the way around. I couldn't find anything redeeming about the installation.

As for defining "confound" I assume that they hold the same definition as the link you provided, which was my operating definition. I'll never know for sure, but I can't be worried about that. If they hold an unorthodox definition of "confound" then they should state that or use a better word.

In response to comment #3, I didn't read the press release until after I returned to the US. I went to the Serpentine site to pull material for my commentary here. That's when I first read the "confound" and "alter space" ideas. Granted, that's what I imagined the artist was going after in the installation while I was there.

My experience of the piece was poor. In all honesty, I was glad to read that the artist had somewhat lofty goals for the work. Though I think it failed horribly, it was reassuring that she was tackling bigger issues. I can respect that.

The comments to this entry are closed.